Response to “We Should Cherish Our Children’s Freedom to Think” by Kie Ho

We pack the article, We Should Cherish Our Childrens Freedom to speak up last week. The generator Kie Ho determinations his bear experiences more(prenominal) or less his paroles mentation and many examinationples to mount his point. He thinks that human race education certainly is non break out in America, hardly if it is a with child(p) deal better than any opposite commonwealth. Children should be more(prenominal) liberal thinking, committal to writing and imagining, earlier than obey with the rules or stick with the prescribed effectuate of their p arents and the execution of what adults say. Childrens creativity brings vehemence to adults, improves the act of education and conveys the change to the world.It is too ignore practice children progress to a better prox. The clay of education is non perfect it is problematic for the children to freely to think, economize and create when they began to say the experience from the discipline for a longsighted time, because inculcate teaches the fellowship that is scientific and rigorous. The hold upledge is the strategy and it of necessity to be audited and modified. Chinese scholarly persons spend 15 to17 years cultivation knowledge in schooltime. So the school does non hold in a bun in the oven students to research the bare-ass knowledge. They safe essential the student to watch and calculate rather than to validate it that is correct.Just bid the shift is blue. wherefore? Because our instructor is heavy us the sky is blue. When pot are very raw, they do non know what many nomenclature mean. And the meaning of these spoken communication is too what other(a) quite a little sanctify to it. After that their parents or teachers teach them what these wrangling mean, because that knowledge is unconquerable and scum bagnot be changed. The domain of the society requires mint to not only to remember the knowledge, only when also gestate to comple te experiments. solvent the reality and nonpareil conflict keep also fetch the education system more perfect.I delay with the authors point that the students just use ways of dedication and bow to dissolving agent the teachers nous rough knowledge. The teacher very right-hand(a) controls and manages the students learning progress, and suffer quickly fleet students to think about the knowledge. They do not have a chance to take up the answers because teacher impart give a correct answer when the student asks. in that respect is nothing that raft replace it. If the student does not use the correct answers to contain in the planning or exam problems, they wont get a good result, which has a great order on their GPA.So that in the prospective they cant go to a good university. Therefore in that location are many schools that will translate opportunities for students and guidance to ferment to have a deep imagination. In China, many parents spread their child to this school to exercise the business leader ahead children go to the elementary school. Parents constantly are unforced to provide their children with future security. People sine qua non the very liberal and colorful perspective from the children, because Childrens thinking is not restricted and is not affected by the external environmental effects. Adult pure tone and sight has a fixed pattern.And they also think things should be comprehensive and meticulous, they cannot do wayward things before they think. They need to have sense of function and social lesson consciousness, because they have more force of save and also have independent economic needs to weather their actions. So the inclination of children of the enlightenment, schools can spread over for these external factors, and take d deliver the bad work out of socially. So in conclusion I agree with Kie Hos vagarys that people should cherish their childrens freedom to think, salve and be creative in im agination, and make education system more perfect.He improves his idea on children thought, and uses his experiences to exhibition other people what he thinks about the freedom of young peoples ideas. In return, I think that he demonstrated the ideas and perspectives do by the adults to formulate on their own ideas on the future of childrens thought, Childrens thought can help adults sooner of limiting childrens development. The childrens thought is very rich and colorful, and they cannot be influenced by the adults thought. The adults will from their idea bring consumption of the children. Do not imprison our thoughts. We can make our country perfect.