How Segregation Was Ruled Illegal in U.S.

How Segregation Was Ruled Illegal in U.S. In 1896, the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case confirmed that different however equivalent was established. The assessment of the Supreme Court expressed, A resolution which suggests simply a legitimate qualification between the white and shaded races-a differentiation which is established in the shade of the two races, and which should consistently exist inasmuch as white men are recognized from the other race by shading - tends to wreck the lawful correspondence of the two races, or restore a condition of automatic subjugation. The choice remained the tradition that must be adhered to until it was upset by the Supreme Court in the milestone Brown v. Leading body of Education case in 1954. Plessy v. Ferguson The Plessy v. Ferguson legitimized the various state and nearby laws that had been made around the United States after the Civil War. The nation over, blacks and whites were lawfully compelled to utilize separate train vehicles, separate water fountains, separate schools, separate doorways into structures, and considerably more. Isolation was the law. Isolation Ruling Reversed On May 17, 1954, the law was changed. In the milestone Supreme Court choice of Brown v. Leading body of Education, the Supreme Court upset the Plessy v. Ferguson ​decision by deciding that isolation was innately inconsistent. In spite of the fact that the Brown v. Leading group of Education was explicitly for the field of training, the choice had an a lot more extensive degree. Earthy colored v. Leading body of Education Despite the fact that the Brown v. Leading body of Education choice upset all the isolation laws in the nation, the order of mix was not quick. In fact, it took numerous years, much strife, and even carnage to coordinate the nation. This fantastic choice was one of the most significant decisions passed on by the United States Supreme Court in the twentieth century.

Hernan Cortes Hero or Villain

The Sun Cannot be secured by a Finger Hearing of the word saint brings to my psyche an attractive man with certain characteristics of reasonable, equivalent, fortitude, courageous, genuine and a positive head. This makes the inverse a reprobate an individual who wishes wrong for somebody or an individual who makes fiendish. The occasion changes drastically, a legend of the past may not be viewed as a saint in the present and versa. Hernando Cortes a legend for joining two universes and vanquishing the most impressive progress of America or Hernando Cortes a miscreant for making the Aztec Empire disappear.Hernando Cortez was a significant image for the investigations, however murdering individuals, finishing the most remarkable human advancement in America and spreading ailments doesn't makes him a saint. With great methodology and not many men Cortes vanquished the Aztec Empire, first Montezuma II and afterward Cuauhtemoc. (5) Spreading sickness â€Å"smallpox† to the Aztecs t hat at that point will spread the infection all over Mexico and making numerous individuals pass on. (2) Taking over a human advancement that had his way of life, language, religion and subsequent to doing this got done with the whole Aztec Empire. (1) If you contend these reasons you get the consequences of a scalawag or for this situation the aftereffect of Cortes. â€Å"For the individuals of Mexico, Cuauhtemoc is a legend as the Spanish are cruel exploiters in their treatment of the indigenous populace. † (3) Not just Mexicans accept that poor and savage treatment for human beans is a wrongdoing. This is something that we were conceived and we quickly knew. Regarding people as slaves is disgraceful and this is actually what Cortes did.Coming to a spot that isn't yours and saying that presently is you place is a certain something, however treating them terrible so they would do what he request and slaughtering them in the event that they chose to contradict is another elev ated level of evilness. (4) Cortes was eventually answerable for the maltreatment endured by indigenous and this contributes hugely to the â€Å"black legend† of victory. (9) The dark legend of the victory was the maltreatment of the Spanish toward the Indigenous. Spanish started to take ladies and kids for the Indians to serve and to utilize insidious from them; they ate their suppers that the Indians got from hard exertion and work of ordinarily from them. 9) All of this where awful treatment towards the Aztecs that before the Spanish got to America was a human advancement that was not terrible treated by anybody. (6) This was the structure they treated the Aztecs that would later prompt the dissipation of the Aztec Empire. The Spanish were beginning to settle just as the diseases.In 100 years 90 percent of the Indians populace kicked the bucket and this was an issue that Cortes conveyed since his appearance. (11) Smallpox was without a doubt the fundamental scoundrel, howe ver not just, as the Spanish additionally presented the mumps and measles, both liable for some passings. 17) There is no proof that these contaminations exist in America before the appearance of the conquistadores. The infection was surely bloodiest than the smallpox in sixteenth century in Europe. (11) It can be obliging that this infection was passed in the primary attempt of Cortes attempting to vanquish the Aztecs in 1521. This being a quick malady that went from individual to individual. (16) When Cortes entered the city in August, found that about a large portion of the populace had kicked the bucket. Over the span of a half year there was not really a solitary town without being contaminated. 11) It has been assessed that about portion of the Aztec individuals passed on in the principal pestilence. While Cortes was planning more men and building ships for assaulting the city, the Aztecs were biting the dust by the malady that his men left the first occasion when they enter t he city. (8) This was a major additional assistance to make things a lot simpler so Cortes could overcome the Aztec Empire. (11) Without truly searching for additional assistance, help was tumbling from the sky towards Cortes; for this situation he discovered that he had murdered a great deal of men with one of his disease.In option, can somebody by considered a saint for something that he truly didn't design? After one in the long run comes the other. Cortes didn't just concentrate on murdering the Aztecs he is still associated with the skirmishes of â€Å"La matanza de Cholula† and â€Å"La matanza del templo mayor†. Cortes required men to assist him with completing the Aztec domain. â€Å"La matanza de Cholula† was an assault by military powers of the Spanish victor Hernando Cortes in his way to the city of Mexico-Tenochtitlan in the year 1519. (12) According to compositions of Cortes it was a forestalling activity on the grounds that there was talk that ther e would have been a potential snare inside the city of Cholula. The outcome was the demise of 5 000 or 6 000 Cholula, for the most part unarmed regular citizens in a period not surpassing six hours. (12) The other fight â€Å"La matanza del templo mayor† otherwise called the evening of tears was the night that Cortes lost portion of his men attempting to escape from the city of Tenochtitlan were additionally numerous Aztecs kicked the bucket; this was the 20 of May 1520. 13) The 27 of June 3 days before the evening of tears happened Montezuma was killed by his own kin, this will prompt the main disarray; days after the fact Cuauhtemoc will be the following chief of the Aztecs being perceived for a progressively forceful pioneer. (14) Cuauhtemoc realizing that Cortes was attempting to engage Tenochtitlan, he sorted out the military and individuals to guard the city, offered to evacuate the tributes to his vassals, invigorated the square and devastated the bridges.The Aztecs pr otected their situations for 75 days, until August 13, 1521. After the 75 days the city was incomprehensible the pioneer attempted to get away yet they were catch by Spanish individuals. (14) Cuauhtemoc was then caught and was threatened to death in the event that he didn't said were the gold was. Cuauhtemoc stayed detained for a long time. He was executed by the vanquishers during the undertaking of Cortes to Central America in 1525 and this was the finish of a human advancement that endure since the appearance of the Spanish. 14) Getting to an end, we dissect how Cortes treated, murdered, battle. Cortes a scalawag for making wicked combat zones where he ventured. Obviously here is the meaning of a lowlife. Spreading infections, causing individuals to endure, completing the human advancement just with the end goal of gold and his own advantages. A saint considers everybody not simply on himself. By and by with great technique and hardly any men Cortes vanquished the Aztec Empire, f irst Montezuma II and afterward Cuauhtemoc causing this to endure much more.However spreading sickness â€Å"smallpox† to the Aztecs that at that point will spread the ailment all over Mexico and making numerous individuals kick the bucket. This sickness executed 90% of the Natives in 100 years. Assuming control over a human progress that had his way of life, language, religion and subsequent to doing this got done with the whole Aztec Empire. Nobody can be viewed as a legend by doing these shrewd things. Cortes verification to be a scoundrel in pretty much every demonstration, now and then isn't sufficient to be a valiant men and brave. You have to utilize this characteristics for good not for awful treatment.

What Can You Accomplish in the Common App Essay

What Can You Accomplish in the Common App Essay What Can You Accomplish in the Common Application Essay? What Can You Accomplish in the Common Application Essay? There are a few things you should be specifically aiming for in your college essay, and all of them are easy enough to accomplish: Make Yourself Memorable: In advertising, the idea of making yourself memorable is called “branding.” Celebrities often call it “star power.” What it really boils down to is finding something about yourself, your experiences, and what you have to offer to the world that is effortlessly recognizable and easily recollected. What will make you stand out in a sea of similarly qualified applicants? If a group of admissions officers is sitting around the decision table, all looking at groups of students with similar GPAs and activity lists, what will make the one reading your essay grab your application, stand up and say, “Take her! Take the dancer who choreographed her presidential election!” “I want the trapeze artist with the fear of heights!” “Don’t forget that hilarious soccer player with the gnarly feet!” An admissions officer should be able to easily recall details that are emblematic of your personality and that are representative of who you are at your core. Tell admissions something they don’t know: You should use these essays as an opportunity to say something that hasn’t been said. This is how I FEEL about this thing. This is what is important to me. This is what I value. Maybe you talk about the bonding that occurs in morning car rides shared with your mom, or your nerdy love of experimenting with model rocket ships. Wouldn’t it be fun to detail your all-consuming allergy to processed foods (we are so sorry about that, by the way), or maybe compare your talents and inner qualities to your favorite sports cars? The students who are most successful try to reveal something to admissions officers that they would not be able to find on your transcript. And this doesn’t mean you can’t write about something that already appears on your activity list or in your academic report. What it means is that your essay shouldn’t be about the mission of Habitat for Humanity, or what you did in your community service hours for that organiza tion; rather it should be about how YOUR experience with Habitat for Humanity changed YOUR life in a real and compelling way. What unexpected experience did you have there? How did it make you a more complete and interesting person? If you can’t tell a story that is personal and revelatory, you should consider looking elsewhere for a topic. Put your personality on display: Are you studious and curious? Are you sensitive and brave? Are you determined? Are you funny? These qualities should shine through in your final essay. No matter the topic, an admissions officer should feel like they’re getting a giant slice of you in there. Family members and friends should be able to recognize your voice. A good test is to think â€" Would it be weird for anyone else to put his/or her name at the top of my essay? If so, you’re on the right track. Prove your value as a community member: As a member of a higher academic institution, your talents and skills and qualities don’t exist in a bubble. Admissions wants to know that you care not only about furthering your own education and realizing your own potential, but also that you will contribute to the larger community. This is why themes like generosity, sincerity, and self-reflection are so important. Schools want to know you will have a positive influence on those around you and that your gifts will be shared with the other great minds they choose for your graduating class. Showcase your basic writing and storytelling abilities: Obviously not all of us are going to be professional writers, and schools will probably expect higher quality writing and storytelling from their aspiring English majors than they will from, say, their aspiring engineers. But in a world where people increasingly communicate using the written word, even if it’s predominantly through email and text, it is crucial for students to have mastered the basics of writing and storytelling. And, (spoiler alert!) all of you will have to write in college. Still, this is the easiest demand to meet. Find a story that is memorable and one that naturally exudes authentic personality, and good storytelling will follow. About CEA HQView all posts by CEA HQ » Want to work one-on-one with an Advisor from our team? We're here to help. GET IN TOUCH »

Who Were the Anti-Federalists

Not all Americans liked the new U.S. Constitution offered to them in 1787. Some, particularly the Anti-Federalists, downright hated it. The Anti-Federalists were a group of Americans who objected to the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and opposed final ratification of the U.S. Constitution as approved by the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Anti-Federalists generally preferred a government as formed in 1781 by the Articles of Confederation, which had granted the predominance of power to the state governments. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia – an influential colonial advocate for American independence from England – the Anti-Federalists feared, among other things, that the powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution could enable the President of the United States to function as a king, turning the government into a monarchy. This fear can to some degree be explained by the fact that in 1789, most of the world’s governments were still monarchies and the function of a â€Å"president† was largely an unknown quantity. Quick History of the Term ‘Anti-Federalists’ Arising during the American Revolution, the term â€Å"federal† referred simply to any citizen who favored of the formation of a union of the 13 British-ruled American colonies and the government as formed under the Articles of Confederation. After the Revolution, a group of citizens who specifically felt that the federal government under the Articles of Confederation should be made stronger labeled themselves the â€Å"Federalists.†Ã‚  Ã‚   When the Federalists attempted to amend the Articles of Confederation to give the central government greater power, they began to refer to those who opposed them as â€Å"Anti-Federalists.† What Drove the Anti-Federalists? Closely akin to people who advocate the more modern political concept of â€Å"states’ rights,† many of the Anti-Federalists feared that the strong central government created by the Constitution would threaten the independence of the states. Other Anti-Federalists argued that the new strong government would be little more than a â€Å"monarchy in disguise† that would simply replace British despotism with American despotism. Still other Anti-Federalists simply feared the new government would become too involved in their daily lives and threaten their personal liberties. The Impacts of the Anti-Federalists As the individual states debated ratification of the Constitution, a wider national debate between the Federalists—who favored the Constitution—and the Anti-Federalists—who opposed it—raged in speeches and extensive collections of published articles. Best known of these articles were the Federalist Papers, written variously by John Jay, James Madison and/or Alexander Hamilton, both explained and supported the new Constitution; and the Anti-Federalist Papers, published under several pseudonyms such as â€Å"Brutus† (Robert Yates), and â€Å"Federal Farmer† (Richard Henry Lee), opposed the Constitution. At the height of the debate, famed revolutionary patriot Patrick Henry declared his opposition to the Constitution, thus becoming the figurehead of the Anti-Federalist faction. The arguments of the Anti-Federalists had more impact in some states than in others. While the states of Delaware, Georgia, and New Jersey voted to ratify the Constitution almost immediately, North Carolina and Rhode Island refused to go along until it became obvious that final ratification was inevitable. In Rhode Island, opposition to the Constitution almost reached the point of violence when more than 1,000 armed Anti-Federalists marched on Providence. Concerned that a strong federal government might reduce the peoples’ individual freedoms, several states demanded the inclusion of a specific bill of rights in the Constitution. Massachusetts, for example, agreed to ratify the Constitution only on the condition that it would be amended with a bill of rights.   The states of New Hampshire, Virginia, and New York also made their ratification conditional pending the inclusion of a bill of rights in the Constitution. As soon as the Constitution had been ratified in 1789, Congress submitted a list of 12 bill of rights amendments to the states for their ratification. The states quickly ratified 10 of the amendments; the ten known today as the Bill of Rights. One of the 2 amendments not ratified in 1789 eventually became the 27th Amendment ratified in 1992. After final adoption of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, Some former Anti-Federalists went on to join the Anti-Administration Party formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in opposition to the banking and financial programs of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton. The Anti-Administration Party would soon become the Democratic-Republican Party, with Jefferson and Madison going on to be elected the third and fourth Presidents of the United States. Summary of Differences Between Federalists and Anti-Federalists In general, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists disagreed on the scope of the powers granted to the central U.S. government by the proposed Constitution. Federalists tended to be businessmen, merchants, or wealthy plantation owners. They favored a strong central government that would have more control over the people than the individual state governments.Anti-Federalists worked mainly as farmers. They wanted a weaker central government that would mainly assist the state governments by providing basic functions like defense, international diplomacy, and setting foreign policy.   There were other specific differences. Federal Court System Federalists wanted a strong federal court system with the U.S. Supreme Court having original jurisdiction over lawsuits between the states and suits between a state and a citizen of another state.Anti-Federalists favored a more limited federal court system and believed that lawsuits involving state laws should be heard by the courts of the states involved, rather than the U.S. Supreme Court. Taxation Federalists wanted the central government to have the power to levy and collect taxes directly from the people. They believed the power to tax was necessary to provide national defense and to repay debts to other nations.Anti-Federalists opposed the power, fearing it could allow the central government to rule the people and the states by imposing unfair and repressive taxes, rather than through representative government. Regulation of Commerce Federalists wanted the central government to have sole power to create and implement U.S. commercial policy.Anti-Federalists favored commercial policies and regulations designed based on the needs of the individual states. They worried that a strong central government might use unlimited power over commerce to unfairly benefit or punish individual states or to make one region of the nation subservient to another. Anti-Federalist George Mason argued that any commercial regulation laws passed by the U.S. Congress should require a three-fourth, supermajority vote in both the House and Senate. He subsequently refused to sign the Constitution, because it did not include the provision. State Militias Federalists wanted the central government to have the power to federalize the militias of the individual states when needed to protect the nation.Anti-Federalists opposed the power, saying the states should have total control over their militias.   Legacy of the Anti-Federalists Despite their best efforts, the Anti-Federalists failed to prevent the U.S. Constitution from being ratified in 1789. Unlike, for example, Federalist James Madison’s Federalist No. 10, defending the Constitution’s republican form of government, few of the essays of the Anti-Federalists papers are taught today in college curricula or cited in court rulings. However, the influence of the Anti-Federalists remains in the form of the United States Bill of Rights. Though influential Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 84, argued vigorously argued against its passage, the Anti-Federalists prevailed in the end. Today, the underlying beliefs of the Anti-Federalists can be seen in the strong mistrust of a strong centralized government expressed by many Americans.    Sources Main, Jackson Turner. â€Å"The Antifederalists: Critics of the Constitution, 1781-1788.† University of North Carolina Press, 1961. https://books.google.com/books?idn0tf43-IUWcCprintsecfrontcoverdqTheAntiFederalists. â€Å"Lesson 1: Anti-federalist Arguments Against ‘A Complete Consolidation.’† The National Endowment for the Humanities, updated 2019. https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans/lesson-1-anti-federalist-arguments-against-complete-consolidation.

My Impressions From Death Of A Salesman - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 2107 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/06/12 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Death Of A Salesman Essay Did you like this example? Death of a Salesman: Play Report Death of a Salesman is a popular play that grapples with the idea of the American Dream by the famous author, Arthur Miller. The play is about Willy Loman and the events that lead to him killing himself. It has received many awards and is still very popular to this day. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "My Impressions From Death Of A Salesman" essay for you Create order He was born on October 17, 1915 in New York during the Great Depression. The Great Depression was a worldwide economic depression that effected millions of people. His father struggled to earn money during the Great Depression, which he believes shaped him as a person. It showed him the insecurity of modern existence, (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica) at a young age which affected his entire life. He was married to the also famous, Marilyn Monroe, for five years and even wrote a play titled, The Misfits, in her name. Death of a Salesman was his second play written, after his Tony Award winning film titled Focus. He had been coming up with ideas for Death of a Salesman since he was a teenager, initially being about a Jewish Salesman. Other popular works of his includes The Crucible, After the Fall, and The Price. He sadly passed away on February 10, 2005, but his legacy lives on as a beloved playwriter. The play takes place in New York in a small home surrounded by apartments in every direction. It takes place in the 1900s, and money is hard to find with the population growing in their town. I believe the overshadowing of their home by the apartments surrounding them symbolized and foreshadowed major facts in the story. Willyrs yearnings to live the American dream overshadowed the importance of his family like apartments overshadowing his home. When Willyrs home slowly breaks from the weight of the apartments, it resembles his slow death leading to his death. The apartments are crowding his home or safe place, like how his dreams consume or crowd his thoughts and prevents him from working to accept things as they are. His home represents many aspects of Death of a Salesman and is great foreshadowing by the author. The set of the play is a small quaint home with a very minimal amount of furniture. On the first floor is the kitchen with the necessities, and behind there is a small liv ing room accompanied with a bedroom to the right. The boyrs bedroom is on the second floor and is not well lit. A portion of the stage represents their backyard next to the home and many scenes take place here. The storyrs setting plays a big role in the development of the story. The plays exposition starts with a traveling salesman named Willy Loman returning home from a business trip to his loving wife, Linda. He comes home to his two sons, Biff and Happy, visiting the family and their arrival becomes the initial incident of the story. The rising action begins when Willy is not happy and frustrated with Biff for not having a job at his age, although Linda tells him not to be too critical. Biff never graduated college which is one of the additional reasons his father is so frustrated. After Willy eats a snack, he starts to hallucinate about past experiences with his two sons. In his daydream, he reminisces about spending time with his sons while they were in high school and chatting with his wife. His daydream ends and soon after Willy is offered a job by his rich brother, Ben. Willy refuses the offer and begins to hallucinate about how his sons stole lumber a while back. His hallucination is over quickly, but his family begins to worry, and they discuss his condition. Willy becomes joyous to hear that his sons wish to go into business together, and Biff decides to go ask Bill Oliver whom is an old employer of Biffs for a loan to achieve their ambitions. Linda tells her sons about how she has found a pipe that showed Willy has tried to commit suicide, so she tells them to be nice to him at dinner. The next day, Willy goes to talk to his employer about staying local for business and no longer travelling, but his wish is declined, and he is fired. Willy has another hallucination, this time about Biffrs football game and he wishes his team to win. As Biff arrives to meet Bill, he realizes the man has no recognition of him, so he steals his fountain pen out of spite. All the boys meet up for dinner that night and ends up in a huge fight which ends up being the climax of the story. Willy reminisces his time with a woman that he was cheating on his wife with, and the stunned expressions on Biffrs face as he walked in on them together. After returning hom e, the boys apologize and Willy becomes once again angry with Biff, which causes him to sob in distress. Once the entire fight is over, everyone goes to bed, but Willy decides to go and commit suicide by driving off a cliff. The resolution of the story includes his funeral in which no one attended, and Linda repeating Were free, to her husbandrs grave. Willy Loman is the husband to Linda Loman and is the main character in this play. He is described to be stubborn, suicidal, short tempered, and in his opinion; well-liked by his peers. His character is completely infatuated with the idea of the American Dream for his family, this idea tends to stand in they way of his true happiness. This standard was a huge obstacle in his life that made it hard for him to accept his family for who they are. Willy tried to be more accepting of his sons, but sadly these tactics did not work. He ended up reverting to his old judgmental ways of life, instead of being accepting. His life ended by committing suicide and left many loose ends in the story. Even until his death, everything he did was for the American Dream in his life. This includes sacrificing himself to pass his inheritance on to his family, so they can be free. Willy was a static character because he cannot let go of the American Dream that his hindered him for so long. He was able to re sist change by sticking to his stubborn ways and not letting go of what he wants. Willy ended up going off the deep end, and it was his anger that led him to suicide. Biff Loman represented so many ideas in Death of a Salesman and stood out from the rest of his family. He is in his mid-thirties and still does not seem to have a stable job. He wanted to find himself and pursue a profession that he loves, unlike Willy and Happy who settled for money. His first job was working on a farm, but he was not content in that job position. Biff is constantly developing in this story because he always wanted to grow as a person and was open to new thoughts and ideas. An example of this, is he has a new goal to go into business with his younger brother. A huge obstacle in his life is his viewing of his fathers failures, specifically Willy cheating on his wife in front of his own eyes. He was the only character to know of his fatherrs cheating, and he disapproved immediately. This causes Biff to seem trapped in a web of lies his father strung; and consequently, leaves him vulnerable in the story. His main tactic to overcome this problem was following his instin cts, which told him to get away from his father and live his own life. Biff was a dynamic character in the story because he changes from an insecure boy living under his fatherrs shadow to a man who realizes the importance of taking care of himself. Happy Loman is also one of the main characters in the story and was important to the plays development. Happy is the youngest son of the Loman family and is in his mid-thirties. He is a successful young man and has many dreams, and who is similar to his father in many ways. His dreams tend to be unrealistic, like his fatherrs unrealistic want to live the American dream. He also is in a career not for enjoyment but for the money itself. Another way he is like his father is because he also is a people pleaser, and this is shown at the restaurant with the female staff. Since he is similar to his father, I think it is very likely he is also lonely inside but has learned to hide it. He is always being looked down on and never praised for being who he is. An obstacle in Happyrs life is like Biffs; trying to live up to his fathers standards. Happy tries to meet this standard by accepting his fathers wants and following them; without seeming to stand up for himself in the story. He does not overcome his obstacle out of fear of rejection from his father. Happy is a static character because he never developed into a new man. He was fixated on being who his family wanted him to be, and not being himself. As discussed, many times in this paper, the American Dream is a major theme in this story. It is shown multiple times in the story in many ways. This is showed when Willy does anything to be liked, even if it means living a lie. Willy always paraded the idea of having so many friends, but no one cared to come to his funeral. Another way he portrayed the want for living the American Dream is how Willy wants an ideal family that is perfect. A quote that supports this is, In the greatest country in the world a young man with such†personal attractiveness, gets lost, (Miller 8) which shows his judgment of his kids based on our countryrs success. Arthur Miller gives the basic question, Is striving for the American Dream worth it when you loose everything? I believe the author believed the author did not think it was worth it, and that is why he killed off the main character to portray his opinion. A very interesting part of the play is that Arthur never told the audience what Willy s old as a travelling salesman. He left this unsaid to leave readers in suspense, and to have us ask ourselves what we believed he sold. Personally, I think Willy sold his personality for popularity because he thought it led to success, when he was broken inside. A quote supporting this is, Hers liked, but hers not well liked, (Miller 21) which refers to Bernard when Willy asked if he was well liked. This basically is saying Bernard is not successful because the family relates popularity with other to success in life. Overall, this was not my favorite play I have read for many reasons. The first reason is I initially found it very confusing and I had to review the story before I was able to write my paper. Another reason is that it is not a happy story, and it does not help when you know someone will die at the end of the story. I also did not like Willy because he could not get over the idea of the American Dream because it seemed to prolong the story without having many happy moments. Although I did not enjoy the story overall, I did enjoy certain parts of it. One part I enjoyed was Biffrs character development even though he has had some troubles in life. My favorite part of the story was the foreshadowing with the setting of the play, including the house and apartments. The way that Arthur was able to foreshadow so many aspects of the play in a subtle way was very clever of him. I also enjoyed seeing Linda being so committed to her and Willyrs relationship, even though he did not deserve it. W illy did everything wrong as a father and husband, and yet his wife stays with him through it all. The play had many interesting scenes and although I did not enjoy all of it, I am glad I got to read it. Words Cited Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Arthur Miller. Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 13 Oct. 2018, www.britannica.com/biography/Arthur- Miller-American-playwright. Death of a Salesman. SparkNotes, SparkNotes, 2018, www.sparknotes.com/lit/salesman/. Shmoop Editorial Team. Death of a Salesman. Shmoop, Shmoop University, 11 Nov. 2008, www.shmoop.com/death-of-a-salesman/.

Forecasting at Hard Rock Cafe Free Essays

For the following case: †¢View the Video Case for Chapter 3 for OMMyLab †¢Bulletize the following (so that the case can be understood fully from your bullets and not have to read the case) †¢Clearly articulate the question(s) you are answering before providing you answer †¢Quantitative Issue The manager is trying to evaluate how a new advertising campaign affects guest counts. Using data for the past 10 months (see the table) develop a least squares regression relationship and then forecast the expected guest count when advertising is $65,000. Provide the answer to your boss and then provide the model as backup) †¢Qualitative Issues 1. We will write a custom essay sample on Forecasting at Hard Rock Cafe or any similar topic only for you Order Now Describe three different forecasting applications at Hard Rock. Name three other areas in which you think Hard Rock could use forecasting models. (Justify your choices) 2. What is the role of the POS system in forecasting at Hard Rock? 3. Justify the use of the weighting system used for evaluating man ¬agers for annual bonuses. 4. Name several variables besides those mentioned in the case that could be used as good predictors of daily sales in each cafe. Provide backup using appropriate technology (Provide the spreadsheets as spreadsheets). Forecasting at Hard Rock Cafe With the growth of Hard Rock Cafe—from one pub in London in 1971 to more than 129 restaurants in more than 40 countries today—came a corporate wide demand for better forecasting. Hard Rock uses long-range forecasting in setting a capacity plan and intermediate-term forecasting for locking in contracts for leather goods (used in jackets) and for such food items as beef, chicken, and pork. Its short-term sales forecasts are conducted each month, by cafe, and then aggregated for a headquarters view. The heart of the sales forecasting system is the point-of-sale sys ¬tem (FOS), which, in effect, captures transaction data on nearly every person who walks through a cafe’s door. The sale of each entree repre ¬sents one customer; the entree sales data are transmitted daily to the Orlando corporate headquarters’ database. There, the financial team, headed by Todd Lindsey, begins the forecast process. Lindsey fore ¬casts monthly guest counts, retail sales, banquet sales, and concert sales (if applicable) at each cafe. The general managers of individual cafes tap into the same database to prepare a daily forecast for their sites. A cafe manager pulls up prior years’ sales for that day, adding information from the local Chamber of Commerce or Tourist Board on upcoming events such as a major convention, sporting event, or con ¬cert in the city where the cafe is located. The daily forecast is further broken into hourly sales, which drives employee scheduling. An hourly forecast of $5,500 in sales translates into 19 workstations, which are further broken down into a specific number of wait staff, hosts, bartenders, and kitchen staff. Computerized scheduling software plugs in people based on their availability. Variances between forecast and actual sales are then examined to see why errors occurred. Hard Rock doesn’t limit its use of forecasting tools to sales. To evaluate managers and set bonuses, a 3-year weighted moving average is applied to cafe sales. If cafe general managers exceed their targets, a bonus is computed. Todd Lindsey, at corporate headquarters, applies weights of 40% to the most recent year’s sales, 40% to the year before, and 20% to sales 2 years ago in reaching his moving average. An even more sophisticated application of statistics is found in Hard Rock’s menu planning. Using multiple regression, managers can compute the impact on demand of other menu items if the price of one item is changed. For example, if the price of a cheeseburger increases from $7. 99 to $8. 99, Hard Rock can predict the effect this will have on sales of chicken sandwiches, pork sandwiches, and salads. Managers do the same analysis on menu placement, with the center section driving higher sales volumes. When an item such as a hamburger is moved off the center to one of the side flaps, the corresponding effect on related items, say french fries, is determined. Hard Rock’s Moscow Cafe Data Month 12345678910 Guest count 21 24 27 32 29 37 43 43 54 66 (in thousands) Advertising 14 17 25 25 35 35 45 50 60 60 (in $ thousand) How to cite Forecasting at Hard Rock Cafe, Essay examples

Norming Performing Team Development Model

Question: Describe about the bruce tuckman forming storming norming performing team development model? Answer: Introduction Joe and Harry combined their first names to form a Johari model that is used as a model for self-awareness, interpersonal relationships, personal development, group dynamics, inter-group relationships and team development. The window expresses information on feelings, attitudes, skills, experience, motivation etc. The Johari window is also used to represent a team in relation with other groups. It is a square with four panels as a pictorial representation of degree of how known we are to others and ourselves (West and Turner, 2006). Johari Window Four Quadrants The Johari window has four quadrants- Arena, Blindspot, Faade and Unknown area. Every person is represented by their own window. Mine is described as under: Quadrant 1- Arena The arena or open area, free self or free area or open self is also known as the area of free activity. The quadrant gives the information about a persons behavior, knowledge, feelings, attitude, views, skills etc that is known by both the group and self (South, 2007). I know my name and age, and so do the other people. This region determines the amount of co-operation and communication I have with other people. When I first meet a new person, I dont gel up quickly. I take a lot of time to get comfortable with the person and create the comfort zone. I dont get too talkative or expressive in the beginning. The aim of a group is to explore and widen the open area so as to enhance communication in the team. I usually start with a relatively small open area because of lack of communication skills but it can be enhanced horizontally into the blind area with the support and feedback of my team members. The group members can also help in expanding my arena vertically downwards by disclosure in the group members. This region is the most ideal and open receptive person. There is a high degree of trust and respect in people for me. I am sensitive to the needs of self and others. I have concern for people whom I care. This region also highlights the personal skills in me and other members (Businessballs.com, 2015). In a team, as an action-oriented role, I played the role of Completer-Finisher. I see the projects completed from start to end. I was ensured to make no mistakes. I was not supposed to make any errors or omissions and pay attention to the finest details in the team. I believe in timeliness and I pushed the team to complete the job on time. I get a bit anxious about petty things and worry about small things unnecessarily. I am a perfectionist and follow an orderly fashion. As a people oriented role, I am a resource investigator. I explore options and alternatives for development and negotiation of resources. The external stakeholders who help in accomplishing the teams objective and I helped in coordinating with them. In a thought oriented role, I am a monitor-evaluator. I analyze and evaluate the ideas that people come up with. I consider all pros and cons to the situation before arriving at a decision. I am a critical thinker and apply strategic approach. I am poor in motivating bec ause I react to events rather than instigating it (Shenton, 2007). Quadrant 2- Blindspot This quadrant indicates the unknown factors of a person himself but the others know it is there within him. This region refers to a situation where one is unacquainted with oneself. This region can be made better by getting useful feedback from peers and managers (Sutton and Stewart, 2002). In an ongoing conversation, I might lose an eye contact that is not noticeable by me but was told from my peers. Sensitive feedback was given by people so that I realize my inner capabilities that are hidden from me. The blind area is not a productive space for an individual. This is basically ignorance about oneself. The capability hidden turns me unproductive that what is expected of me. For example, while eating in a restaurant some food particle sticks on my mouth. I dont see it but the other people can see it. Unless the other people tell me about the food particle stuck on my mouth, I wont know since it is a blind spot to me. I did not get very sincere answers from my peers as they hesitated to share any problem thinking they would embarrass me (West and Turner, 2007). In a team as an action oriented role, I have hidden capabilities of a Shaper. I challenge the team to improve on the grounds of punctuality and timeliness. I was told by peers that I am an extrovert who questions norms and takes effort to solve problems by developing the best strategies. I find obstacles as new challenges that need to be overcome. I dont let the team members quit when they want to. I motivate them in my very own ways. I get argumentative at times, and that offends the feelings of other people. As a role in people- oriented, I am a coordinator. I guide the team and the stakeholders by bringing them together in the best motive. Team cohesion is a priority for me where I can help people getting along and resolving conflicts. I bring out the best motive and value from each team member by delegating those tasks what they are good at. I tend to be manipulative at times as reported by my peers. Sometimes, I also try to shred away too many responsibilities from me. As a thou ght orientation, I am a Specialist, I can only contribute to a team task because of lack in specialized knowledge (Businessballs.com, 2015). When comparing with Tuckmans team model, it undergoes the Storming stage. The decisions dont apply easily within the group in this phase. There needs to be a focus on goals of the team so as to avoid getting distracted by emotional issues and relationships. There is formation of cliques and factions with the struggle for power. At times, to enable progress, compromises may be necessary (Sutton and Stewart, 2002). Quadrant 3- Faade This is the hidden area of what the person knows about himself but is unknown to others. These involve fears, manipulative intentions, sensitivities or anything a person does not reveal about himself. In a team role, according to action orientation, I play the role of an Implementer. I get things done through people in a manipulative way that I know would be beneficial for the team. I am conservative in nature and do not like to beat around the bush. I am organized and work systematically. Other do not know my inflexibility to new changes been made in the environment and I follow escapism in such cases. As a people oriented, I play the role of a team worker. I bring the team together by supporting them and making work as a single unit. I have a tendency to be indecisive when it comes to making decisions or maintaining positions. I help people get along their problems. I fear judgment or vulnerability therefore hide back my feelings for a situation. As a thought oriented, I am a Plant who tends to ignore given constraints and parameters. I am impractical at times and a poor communicator. A lot of hidden information is work-related and not very personal. Sometimes people get emotion ally upset and need some motivation as they are resilient in nature. This has also been described in the Maslows Hierarchy of Needs. The relevant hidden information or feelings must be moved in the open area by self-disclosure and exposure process (Handy, 2000). When compared to Tuckmans model, it undergoes Norming stage. The roles and responsibilities are clear enough and acceptable. The decision making process is handed over to individuals for minor issues. The unity and commitment in the group or team is strong. The team has a working style that proves beneficial as a whole. Also, the team leader engages in social as well as fun activities. There is a general respect for the team leader among team members and that is evident. The organizational culture has a major influence on the team members for disclosing their hidden selves. Even the working atmosphere in the group matters for the same reason. The extent to which I disclose my personal feelings or information must be at my own discretion (Mindtools.com, 2015). Conclusion Johari window helps in analyzing personal self and also other peoples behavior and thinking patterns, interpersonal skills, and attitudes. This is helpful and taken into consideration in job profiling, human resource planning, customer relations and human resource planning. As a self-disclosure to be effective, judgment needs to be practiced by me. I must be honest and clear with my opinions. The estimate must be made to enhance a building relationship. The Johari window helps disclosures in enormous ways. Open area is considered to be the most ideal region for a person to explore oneself and others knowing the exact you. References Businessballs.com, (2015).bruce tuckman forming storming norming performing team development model. [online] Available at: https://www.businessballs.com/tuckmanformingstormingnormingperforming.htm [Accessed 7 Jul. 2015]. Businessballs.com, (2015).johari window model - helpful for personal awareness and group relationships. [online] Available at: https://www.businessballs.com/johariwindowmodel.htm [Accessed 7 Jul. 2015]. Handy, C. (2000).21 ideas for managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Mindtools.com, (2015).Belbin's Team Roles: How Understanding Team Roles Can Improve Team Performance. [online] Available at: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_83.htm [Accessed 7 Jul. 2015]. Shenton, A. (2007). Viewing information needs through a Johari Window.Reference Services Review, 35(3), pp.487-496. South, B. (2007). Combining mandala and the Johari Window: An exercise in self-awareness.Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 2(1), pp.8-11. Sutton, J. and Stewart, W. (2002).Learning to counsel. Oxford: How To Books. Verklan, M. (2007). Johari Window.The Journal of Perinatal Neonatal Nursing, 21(2), pp.173-174. West, R. and Turner, L. (2006).Understanding interpersonal communication. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. West, R. and Turner, L. (2007).Introducing communication theory. Boston: McGraw-Hill.